When Politics Trumps Policy

While the public demand for the pitiful justice system to cooperate fancy a safe and secure environment, in that location be too occasions whereby the public may feel that the immoral justice agencies are actually the one posing un incumbent threats to the society. Issues like the ab using up of authority, crazily vehicle pursuits and unauthorized use of weapons are all examples of fonts in which the criminal justice system is actually threatening the safety of the public.This paper bequeath discuss the case of Racin Rays Wild Day to discover the issues come tod in the decisions made by Ripley as a right enforcing authority. Central Issues The central issue in the case study would be the authority of the police officers to use excessive force as advantageously as to engage in blood-red pursuits. Due to a prior incident of a un secondmented pursuit ending with the death of a 14 year old teenager, the Pineville County Sheriffs Department is currently facing a lawsuit. As such, the Department has enforced stricter rules and regulations to prevent such accidents from fortuity again.However, another key issue which has cropped up would be that of the behavior of alternate Raymond Ray Ripley who has been observed to be overstepping regulations as well as lovely in activities that are not part of his responsibilities such as to go for extra patrol as well as to engage in the violent pursuit of a vehicle that was not warranted since rules have been implemented to prohibit any pursuit which does not overwhelm any violent felony crime or pose significant threat to the community.In gain, he is also using weapons which he does not have the authority to use (Peak, 2010). Use-of-force insurance insurance policy Ripleys actions is not compliant with the use of force policy which states that a supervisor should cancel any pursuit that does not involve a violent felony crime or other mess that would cut the danger and potential liability . In additi on, A separate policy prohibits the firing of warning shots unless circumstances warrant. (Peak, 2010).In the given case, Ripley had no indorse to demonstrate that the vehicle he was chasing was involved in any violent felony crime or circumstances that would pose extreme danger. In addition he used his fired warning shots even though the circumstances were not yet dangerous. As such, he was clearly violating the use-of-force policy. End Ripleys pursuit The lieutenant should end Ripleys pursuit. Firstly, this is because Ripley has already overstepped the policies implemented by the Department, as such there is a possibility that he would however abuse his power to bring about unnecessary harm to others.In addition, the Department is already involved in a current efficacious tussle. Should any mistakes go wrong with this one, the consequence would be especially frightening and people would lose confidence in the criminal justice agency. outlet warning shots The deputy should ha ve fired the warning shot. The surgical incision has already in miscellaneaed officers that no warning shots should be fired unless circumstances warrant. In this case, the officer was following normal regulations of being at least 30 meters away from the vehicle.In addition, he has proof to show that the circumstances warrant his actions since the driver was speeding towards him and thus the warning shot was fired to keep up his life. Lodging a complaint In the event that the people in the vehicle lodge a complaint about Ripley and his use of the force, the cross and the taser gun, there are various departmental policies which would need to be applied. First, it is necessary to record down all the processes involved during the whole incident including when , how and wherefore the deputy came across the vehicle, fired the warning shots and gave chase to the vehicle.Given that there is evidence to sufficient to show that the deputy did abuse his authority such as to own a Taser gu n and to use a dog, portion disciplinary actions would need to be taken to hold the deputy enumerateable for his actions. However, the head of the department will need to deliberate and take into account the factors affecting the situation and the decision-making of the deputy behind implementing the most appropriate form of punishment (Davis). Additional policiesGiven that the misconduct of the deputy has been identified, it is important that the department implement policies to ensure that similar acts do not occur again. Hence, this would involve programs like training as well as frequent audits to ensure that officers do not engage in behaviors that involve the abuse of their authority. In addition, the department should also set up a program to reminder the progress of those who have previously engaged in misconduct ahead to ensure that they are competent enough for their work. ConclusionIn conclusion, the case of Ripley demonstrates the serious consequences of the abuse of authority by law enforcing officials. Therefore, it is necessary for criminal justice agencies to implement the appropriate strategies and programs to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again. ? Reference Davis, J. (n. d. ). Police Misconduct and Civil Rights Law. Retrieved from http//library. findlaw. com/1999/Nov/1/126320. hypertext mark-up language Peak, K. (2010). Justice administration police, courts, and corrections management (6th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson/ prentice Hall.