Endotracheal Intubation to Supraglottic Airway Device

Endotracheal canulization to Supraglottic Airway DeviceDiscussion Response 1Much debate has occurred recently about high stroke place and inauspicious effects associated with pre-hospital paramedic endotracheal cannulisation. Should ETT be removed entirely and replaced with supraglottic respiratory tracts?Maintaining an form hose in a safe and effective manner is critical in pre-hospital management of the unhurried in respiratory distress. The debate regarding the most eliminate device to manage this situation in the pre-hospital setting will rest as devices and education and gentility of paramedics continues to improve.This discussion compares the failure rates and adverse effects of endotracheal intubation to supraglottic air lane devices and discusses the possibility of removal of endotracheal tubes in choose of the design of supraglottic airline businesss.The indications for endotracheal intubation for Victorian Paramedics are cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, GCS great than or equal to 10 with suspected air passage fire (a debate is required), GCS less than 10 due to respiratory failure, neurological trauma, overdose, status epilepticus, hyperglycemia with blood glucose aim reading high or suspected skyway burns. The paramedic requires clinical experience to recognise the 5 main indicators for intubation failure to beam, failure to oxygenate, inability to protect against aspiration, inability to maintain air passage patency or predicting forbearing deterioration to respiratory failure (Lafferty Dillinger, 2016).Intubation victor rates range from 69% to 98.4% the variation accounts for the level of education, training and case exposure. The triumph rate or lack in that respectof is flat proportional to the amount of education, training and case exposure received (Jacobs Grabinsky, 2014 and Piegeler, et al., 2016). In Australian studies it was found that Victorian HEMS based paramedics who underwent extensive training that include hospital based practice (Bernard S. A., et al., 2015) attained 97% (Bernard S. , Smith, Foster, Hogan, Patrick, 2002) 100% (Andrew, et al., 2015) success rate. These intubations showed improvements with oxygen saturation, end tidal carbon dioxide levels, blood pressure (Bernard S. , Smith, Foster, Hogan, Patrick, 2002) and spite scores (Andrew, et al., 2015). There is a recommendation from the European Resuscitation Council that only hygienic trained and experienced paramedics should perform endotracheal intubation and alternate airway devices should be used by less trained paramedics (Schalk, et al., 2012). Failure to maintain readiness of this skill increases the risk of errors eliminating the benefits of endotracheal intubation and results in a negative patient outcome (Tiah, et al., 2014).Endotracheal intubation is performed to ensure adequate ventilation and oxygenation also to annul aspiration of stomachic contents or blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Piegeler, et al., 2016) and when the airway is threatened due to oedema in the setting of facial burns or suspected inhalation burns (Price Milner, 2012). Improved patient outcomes were show when endotracheal intubation was successfully achieved compared to those with a supraglottic device, there was a higher relative relative incidence of return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital rise to power, neurologically intact, survival to hospital discharge. (Benoit, Gerecht, Steuerwald, McMullan, 2015). ephemeral harm from airway management is common hitherto serious injury is not (Cook MacDougall-Davis, 2012). Complications attributed to endotracheal intubation are commonly hoarseness and sore pharynx, however patients can also experience lip swelling, laceration and bleeding, tongue laceration and bleeding, oral bleeding, dental damage, gingival bleeding, and pharyngeal bleeding (Toda, Toda, Arakawa, 2013). Failed intubation is associated with oxygen desaturation , hypertension, admission to intensive care unit and complications at extubating (Cook MacDougall-Davis, 2012). The risks associated with out of hospital endotracheal intubation are pulmonary aspiration, hinder in transport due to several attempts, tube misplacement or thorny airway management. In these cases, where an invasive and conviction consuming proficiency may delay definitive care it may be much appropriate to utilise a supraglottic airway device as an alternating(a) (Piegeler, et al., 2016).The indications for the use of a supraglottic airway device are unconscious patient without gag reflex, ineffective ventilation with BVM and oro- or nasal-pharyngeal airway, predicted greater than 10 transactions assisted ventilation required, or unable to intubate or difficult intubation (Ambulance Victoria, 2016). Many studies indicate a less than 1% failure rate of supraglottic airway devices (Cook MacDougall-Davis, 2012) this is due to the lower education and training desti ny and the device being less invasive (Jacobs Grabinsky, 2014). The failure rates were contributed to airway soiling and aspiration before paramedic treatment commenced. Proficiency of use is quickly attained (Haske, Schempf, Gaier, Niederberger, 2013), the device is faster to hive away with higher success rate (Duckett, Fell, Kimber, Taylor, 2014) decreasing interruptions during a cardiac arrest and ventilation is possible with continuous compressions (Haske, Schempf, Gaier, Niederberger, 2013).The i-gel is a 2nd generation supraglottic airway device that exerts really low pressures on the pharyngeal mucosa resulting in low incidence of airway complication such as hoarseness and sore throat (Michalek, 2013). The major concerns of the use of any supraglottic airway device is the potential for air leak, airway, vocal cord and soft tissue injury, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia (Jacobs Grabinsky, 2014) and aspiration of gastric contents (Piegeler, et al., 2016). This generation of device is designed with a channel to insert a gastric tube to drain the stomach contents or air (Michalek, 2013) to prevent aspiration.Comparing placement success and time to ventilate when comparing unassisted endotracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device (Frascone, et al., 2011), hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge, and neurological or functional status (Tiah, et al., 2014) there is no significant difference between the two types of devices (Frascone, et al., 2011 and Tiah, et al., 2014).In the metropolitan setting of paramedic practice there is a solid tune for the cessation of endotracheal use in favour of a supraglottic device. The low level of education and training required to ensure proficiency, fast insertion time and the addition of the gastric tube channel along with the shorter transport multiplication to definitive care indicates that a supraglottic airway is most appropriate airway device.ReferencesAmbulance Victoria. (2016). Clinical Practi ce Guidelines for Ambulance and MICA Paramedics (Revised Edition ed.). Doncaster, Victoria, Australia Ambulance Victoria. Retrieved March 19, 2017Andrew, E., de Wit, A., Meadley, B., Cox, S., Bernard, S., Smith, K. (2015, July/September). Characteristics of patients transported by a paramedic-staffed helicopter emergency medical service in Victoria, Australia. Prehospital hand brake Care, 19(3), 416 424. inside10.3109/10903127.2014.995846Benoit, J. L., Gerecht, R. B., Steuerwald, M. T., McMullan, J. T. (2015). Endotracheal intubation versus supraglottic airway placement in out-of-hospital cardiac arret A meta-analysis. Resuscitation, 93, 20 26. inside10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.05.007Bernard, S. A., Smith, K., Porter, R., Jones, C., Gailey, A., Cresswell, B., . . . St Clair, T. (2015). Paramedic rapid sequence intubation in patients with non-traumatic coma. nip Medicine Journal, 32, 60 64. doi10.1136/emermed-2013-202930Bernard, S., Smith, K., Foster, S., Hogan, P., Patrick, I. (2002, December). The use of rapid sequence intubation by ambulance paramedics for patients with severe head injury. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 14(4), 406 411. doi10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00382Bernhard, M., Mohr, S., A., W. M., Martin, E., Walther, A. (2012, February). developing the skill of endotracheal intubation implication for emergency medicine. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 56(2), 164 171. doi10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02547Cook, T. M., MacDougall-Davis, S. R. (2012). Complications and failure of airway management. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 109(S1), i68 i85. doi10.1093/bja/aes393Duckett, J., Fell, P., Kimber, C., Taylor, C. (2014). Introduction of the i-gel supraglottic airway device for prehospital airway management in a UK ambulance service. Emergency Medicine Journal, 31, 505 507. doi10.1136/emermed-2012-202126Frascone, R. J., Russi, C., Lick, C., Conterato, M., Wewerka, S. S., Griffith, K. R., . . . Salzman, J. G. (2011). analogy of prehospita l insertion success rates and time to insertion between step endotracheal intubation and supraglottic airway. Resuscitation, 82, 1529 1536. doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.009Haske, D., Schempf, B., Gaier, G., Niederberger, C. (2013). Performance of the i-gel during pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resiscitation. Resuscitation, 564, 72 77. doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.025Jacobs, P., Grabinsky, A. (2014, January March). Advances in prehospital airway management. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury attainment, 4(1), 57 64. doi10.4103/2229-5151.128014Lafferty, K. A., Dillinger, R. (2016, December 30). Rapid Sequence Intubation. (R. P. Byrd, Ed.) Retrieved March 19, 2017, from Medscape http//emedicine.medscape.com/article/80222-overviewa1Michalek, P. D. (2013). The I-Gel Supraglottic Airway. Nova Science Publishing Inc. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from http//ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vu/detail.action?docID=3022405Piegeler, T., Roessler, B., Goliasch, G., Fischer, H., Schlaepfer, M., Lang, S., Ruetzler, K. (2016, May). Evaluation of six different airway devices regarding puking and pulmonary aspiration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) A human cadaver pilot project study. Resuscitation, 102, 70 74. doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.17Price, L. A., Milner, S. M. (2012). The totality of burn care. Trauma, 15(1), 16 28. doi10.1177/1460408612462311Schalk, R., Auhuber, T., Haller, O., Latasch, L., Wetzel, S., Weber, C. F., . . . Byhahn, C. (2012, January). effectuation of the laryngeal tube for prehospital airway management training of 1,069 emergency physicians and paramedics. Der Anaethesist, 61(1), 35 40. doi10.1007Tiah, L., Kajino, K., Alsakaf, O., Bautista, D. C., Ong, M., Lie, D., . . . Gan, H. N. (2014, November). Does Pre-hospital Endotracheal Intubation Improve Survival in Adults with Non-traumatic Out-of hospital cardiac Arrest? A Systematic Review. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, XV(7), 749 757. doi10. 5811/westjem.2014.9.20291Toda, J., Toda, A. A., Arakawa, J. (2013, October 17). Learning curve for paramedic endotracheal intubation and complications. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 6(38). doi10.1186/1865-1380-6-38